Showing posts with label Personal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Personal. Show all posts

Wednesday, 28 June 2017

Stormblood (SB) The SideQuest


Right let’s get to the positives about SB:


The story is pretty good with some interesting and fun characters.  A few of them you may just fall in love with.  This story has everything you can expect from a typical Final Fantasy.

The new areas are very large and at times feel like a bit too large but I would always choose large over small any day of the week.  You will spend quite a bit of time getting through the new content.

Abilities/Jobs have taken a large refresh with some being removed, some altered and some new ones.  As a WHM and part time BRD during SB I have to say I can’t complain.  I’m happy with these changes and I also the new jobs seems fun.  RDM will be my choice of new one once I’ve finished BRD/PLD to 70.


I think that’s it for the positives….  That’s the sad part.  This was always going to be compared to HeavensWard (HW) which many reviews and even me had said that HW was one of the greatest expansions made.  Not only was it’s story brilliant but the amount of content was unbelievable and its attention to detail was just as good.


SB though severely lacks that attention to detail.  You will find a lot of random buildings you can’t enter.  A lot of small villages which seem to contain about 5 NPCs each and the amount of side quests in this game is just insane.  You will see endless amount of !!!! all over your map.  Even the dungeons feel like something is missing..  what is it?  No new mid boss music, no new main boss music and even the main scenario quests seem to be using same old music.  HW presented endless amount of new music – I’d love to know how much more for those who want to do the comparison for me?


The detail attention is also shown in the new zones.  Where everything feels as if it doesn’t matter.  You’ve got a few nice things to look at but the detail of the zones seems as if they needed a polish.  It almost feels like going back to expansion packs on XI that were never finished.  You’d get some new content, new jobs but you wasn’t able to progress far because SE had not finished none of it yet.  This was my biggest grumble of XI – never being able to finish anything till years later.  The expansions were always missing something.


The usual run all over the map to earn the right to fly.  I sometimes enjoy this but some areas require you to walk all over the map for a single aether.  The worst part?  The locater will not pick up the nearest one.  You could end up walking to the other side just to find out one aether was right next to you – I did this several times.


This time around it really feels like SE didn’t spend the same amount of time working on SB like they did for HW.  Perhaps it was because they spent more time making general game changes like the jobs/abilities?  Maybe it’s because they had to make changes to co-inside with everything?  Even the Duty Finder had gone through a few changes.


Then we get to the release especially Early Access (EA).  Let me get started by saying this isn’t testing BETA or ALPHA EA.  This was a reward for Pre-Ordering the game.  The idea is SE knows exactly how well SB has done before initial release.  The sooner they have numbers the better.  This was not “please test our game for us”.


So those problems: 

  • The server transfer to the new Omega EU server struggled after the first few hours of release
  • Transfer system completely failed
  • Two days wait time if you actually managed to transfer just before the system went down
  • Everyone you know had already transferred
  • Server you was on is a high busy/populated server
  • The server transfer was made available during EA instead of two weeks prior to release
  • Severe lag – after SE said it had implement solutions to cut this down
  • Unable to proceed during it’s early single player instances – SE had implemented solutions to prevent this
  • Random disconnections constantly
  • Server queues going up to 6000 I think the highest I had spotted (that’s right queuing before you even start playing)
  • High DPS queues of 30minutes – even after SE said this wouldn’t be an issue

You’d think in 2017 when servers are not as expensive as you think (I can spend £10K on a single virtual server).  SE said several times it had implemented a lot to cut down all the above.


This was also during a time SE said they suffered a DDOS attack which in all honesty is very possible.  It’s also possible that SE should have experience in prevention because both XIV/XI has suffered this in the past.  Course I totally accept that nothing is 100% secure as the world finds out daily.


I’ve not touched base on everything – I’ve not touched crafting, not finished the MSQ but I’m very close to it.  I’ve not done all the side quests – far too many.


I believe I gave HW a strong 8/10 or even a 9/10 with little room to improve.  I would have to give SB a weak 6/10 and feels a bit like XI days.  It seems SB has suffered a lack of attention to detail and certainly feels like there’s a lot more that could have been done. 

 

  • Not enough new dungeons/trials
  • Not enough attention to detail on the areas
  • Huge lack of new music
  • Lack of new characters
  • Story was good but not great
  • Bad state of connection/instance problems

 

The Technical Problems

Read on if you care or ignore them if you don’t.  One thing people will always know who work in the IT profession.  The developers are not always the ones at fault but as long as they voice their concerns it’s no longer their responsibility.


I manage a large IT network of almost 1000 PCs, 1800+ users and my network must be online 24/7.  We are around 97% 1GB networking and around the same regarding decent PCs.  We will stick SSDs in most of those machines next year.  So things are not 100% perfect on the speed front.


We do how ever have the ability to increase our equipment needs with no degradation of performance from the servers.  Another words – we could handle another few hundred users connecting up and using their data areas (we call them network drives) with no performance impact.  This is VERY similar to SE and their servers connecting thousands of users concurrently.


It is my job to ask my team to say “are our servers currently stable”.  They can lie to me and say yes – in which case they’re no good to me and I don’t want them in my team.  They won’t do this.


They will instead tell me that the data storage server is currently sitting at 35% remaining which is questionable.  This means we are currently looking at Cloud alternatives or purchasing a new SAN system with 4 times the current storage capacity at least.  We also purchased not long ago a NAS server to deal with our film editing suites (around 100 students doing film studies making large DVD/Blu Ray size videos).


So I say this:  Someone at SE didn’t anticipate this amount of traffic or perhaps secured their system well enough.  DDOS attacks are usually halted by good IT staff in around 24-48 hours.   I know this because I was once part of a network that suffered this and it crippled our broadband connection.  The problem was resolved in around 32 hours suffering a day and a half of impacted lessons.


What SE should have done, is disconnected their system even if it meant the rest of us couldn’t access XIV.  I’d rather have it shut down for a day to resolve the problem and drag it on for a week


SE these are lessons to be learnt.


Update:  So now I’ve gone through the majority of SB and finished the story.  I can’t help but feel unsatisfied. It’s becoming very repetitive where a character never dies, always comes back and never really feels threatening.  Out of all this content only two boss fights stand out.  The final MSQ one – you will know what it is and the ‘different’ boss that doesn’t require fighting.  That’s it.  Also only one dungeon stood out again the last one for the MSQ.  All the others felt disappointing.  Even swimming feels almost underwhelming.  It’s brilliant to finally be able to swim but…. Could have been used more even in dungeons to travel.


Now it’s time for me to cap my gear (which I’m doing quite well on it – new AF is alright but already got about 4-5 pieces better off).  And do my next job and due to the state of DPS queues I will be doing PLD next.

 

The positives:

  • I’m happy with the state of job classes
  • Swimming
  • PVP has greatly improved with queue times very low
  • Few good characters
  • A huge new City
  • Possible known story for 5.0 which I hope see’s the end of… certain type of characters (all the main bad guys appearing since 1.0) and the empire.
  • Improved chocobo speed
  • General improvements to the game it self (from DF, jobs, menus etc)
I've probably not covered everything but this will do.

Formula 1: That Vettel Incident.

This will sting a few tails and egos.
Follow me on Twitter if you wish to see more. 


The moment of madness, the moment very esque of Michael Schumacher and there’s been plenty of 50/50 ones too.  Over the years we’ve seen drivers go for gaps that either didn’t quite exist or were closed quickly resulting in accidents.  These tend to be 50/50 on racing incidents or the driver penalised for ramming another driver.


There have been moments where the driver has purposely tried to take out another car or give them a knock.  This time around there was no doubt Sebastian Vettel had purposely tried to knock Lewis.  It’s an incredibly silly thing to do because it can put you both out.  We’ve seen these cars take far less knocks that puts them out.  Vettel was very lucky that Lewis didn’t suffer a DNF because of it.  If he had I wouldn’t have any sympathy for him being banned for 1-3 races for taking another driver out.  You can’t do it.


To make matters worse Sebastian acted like he did nothing.  That’s right – nothing.  Every time some one talked/asked about that collision Vettels response was “the one where Lewis slowed down”.  This means he was in complete denial about it.  Maybe his state of mind isn’t in a happy place.  Maybe there’s tension at Ferrari.  We never know the full story till the end of the season when contracts are renewed or not.


If Seb had simply said “I’m sorry, I was angry because I strongly believe Lewis break tested me to freak me out.  It was a moment of madness I was pumped for the race and wanted to get going.  All I can say is I’m sorry.”


On that I think the world would have gone silent.  I’m a fan of his because he loves British comedys and I love his sense of humour.  He’s a talented young guy and just like Lewis, just like Alonso and all the other great champions – when pressure hits.. when things don’t go so well they react VERY badly.  Almost in an act of desperation.


This moment makes me think that things are not perfect in Team Ferrari.  For two races now Ferrari have dropped in the pace and now it’s looking like race pace is a 3 horse race with Merc slightly ahead on qualifying and races as well.  With RBR fast approaching on race day.  What does this mean?  It means the title is still not resolved and it’s anyone’s guess who wins it.  If Lewis suffers a bit of bad luck Bottas can quickly hit the points.  Likewise for Seb.

Seb must know this is the best chance Ferrari have had for years to win the title.  No longer do they need to rely on consistency but they can win although that’s two races now it’s changed.  Ferrari can lose.


Lewis Did Not Break Test


Argue all you want.  We’ve all used the breaks, we’ve all gone racing in some form – we know what break testing is.  It’s where you hit the breaks to scare the driver behind – that’s right it’s where you USE THE BREAKS.  It’s not called break testing for a reason.  Lewis did not use his breaks this is fact.  Unless the data Merc/FIA have is false.  If it is false – Merc deserve to be banned a few races and perhaps docked points for falsifying data.

Let’s face it though – the onboard camera showed two things.  Lewis slowed down and Vettel speeds up when leaving the corner.  

Every driver knows what happens when the safety car comes in.  The teams relay this information to the drivers.  This means a few things:  Prepare to get the race back under way.  Do not over take till the safety car line.  Be prepared for the pack to be bunched up and SLOWED DOWN.  The lead driver effectively becomes the safety car.  The lead driver dictates the pace but is NOT allowed to speed up and break dangerously.

So why is it that one driver failed this – Vettel.  Why is that an experienced 4 time world champion failed this moment – madness? Mindset? Issues at Team Ferrari? We will never know.  He denied all this.

The weird thing is I’ve hardly seen any defenders of Vettel.  They’ve either been quiet or instantly looked at Lewis – “Oh look team instructions” or “He started it by break testing”.  Instead of “Vettel what are you doing…”.


As a Lewis Hamilton fan if that was my driver.. I’d be furious.  It reminds me when Lewis refused a team order to move over for Fernando so he could complete his qualifying lap.  What was he thinking?  It also reminded me of the moment he and team Mclaren lied about overtaking under the safety car.  Technically Mclaren did nothing wrong but because they lied about the entire thing…  it became a mess.  What was Mclaren and Lewis thinking?


There’s also this:




The clear refusal to talk about that incident.  Every time Vettel is asked about the contact he immediately reverts to “break test”.  No Sebastian that’s not the question and stop avoiding it.  He’s taking a clear lack of responsibility here in fact he’s also changing the wording to his “break test” to more like “well err I’m sure he didn’t do it on purpose”.  So either HE DID break test you.   Again another question came on about the contact 2nd time – “I waved my hand…. 


No mater which way you put it.  He refuses to talk about THAT collision.  He knows he did wrong and he knows it’s a serious thing.  On this matter I really can’t feel for Sebastian.  He’s seen the footage and probably is starting to realise that Lewis may not have break tested him but maybe Lewis wasn’t being very smart in to doing it right after the corner? 

Funny isn’t it.


The British Press


I’ve often talked about the press.  And I see silly comments like “If that was a British driver that did it.. it would be all quiet”.  WRONG.


The British press made huge news out of Lewis being pulled over by the police in Australia.  Mark Webber’s response was “Typical nanny state” about his home land.  Yet the British press went on about this for 24 hours.  About how his car was impounded, picture of him in the back seats of the police car.  All for a bit of fun on the road which most people do in nice cars.  To be fair – I gave no sympathy to Lewis.


All that for a simple thing with Lewis Hamilton?  What about when he split from his father being his agent? This hit the news.   What about when his father crashed his car? This hit the news.  Every incident that occurred including the LieGate – it hit the news.

So rightly so Vettel purposely ramming another driver has hit the news.  Like it or not – F1 and especially Lewis Hamilton is news.  Good or bad.


People who claim they only go after non British are full of rubbish.


The overall drivers tend to not take the blame during the emotional period.  They do however tend to admit their mistakes after seeing the footage.  However again this time around Vettel still refuses to admit responsibility.  How do you define that?  This isn’t a racing incident where a driver has gone for a gap which got closed.  This isn’t a moment where Lewis/Seb turned in to each other.

This is a bit of a reminder of the Vettel/Webber where by the camera you could see which driver slightly turned in to the other – Vettel.  Although this time around it was not at high speed and the turning was much clearer and much sharper.  Vettel had turned in to Lewis.  No Ifs, No Buts and no data required.  It showed it on both onboard cameras, from the front, the back and even on board with Bottas.  Vettel had turned in to another driver.


The sad thing is – I don’t see this being the end.  I can see something happen – there’s already talk about an investigation.  The punishment wasn’t good enough but I wouldn’t punish him any more.  Instead I would look at the Stewards rules.  If a driver is intentionally hitting another one (where there’s no doubt) that driver should be black flagged.  This wasn’t an overtaking moment.  It wasn’t a fight for a corner it was a blatant turn in to the driver to hit the car not to gain a position.  Remember MSC turning to JV? That was a blatant – I’m going to hit you.


You can’t do that in 2017 Formula One.  The whole world is watching you.  I will say this though it does show a sheer lack of consistency in the fans.  Those who couldn’t defend their driver instead lashed out at another.  It’s pathetic.  If that was my driver I’d be embarrassed.. shocked and disgusted.  Like I was as a Mclaren fan over the SpyGate and LieGate.  What penalty did Lewis suffer over a pathetic little lie.  Everyone went mad over a Lie which they didn’t need to do.  Instead this caused a bigger storm than what we’ve seen over the RamGate.  Mclaren faced a suspended 3 race ban over the mess.  A simple lie which was an honest mistake on track which then became a constant lie.  A man lost his job at Mclaren.  The press, whiting and the FIA went mad.


You know if I drove up to a colleague and rammed their car or lied to my boss – which was the most punishing crime?  There’s no comparison.  I’d most likely be facing the full force of the law for driving dangerously.


This is what I find most ridiculous.


Update: For those who want to continue whining about “opinions” over facts.  Just remember if Lewis Hamilton had break tested – he’d be rightly punished.  Instead there is no investigation.


It appears there’s now a video that shows both restarts controlled by Lewis with Seb behind.  Both videos showed Lewis slow down at that corner but the 2nd time Seb was much closer.  It appears Seb really did accelerate in to Lewis.  I’d say an honest mistake that happens. 




See the video – it also shows the accident which again no one can deny it was done by purpose.
















The data was released to the FIA.  Either the FIA are corrupt and are protecting Lewis Hamilton – In which case we’re talking about something bigger than the SpyGate saga or Lewis is innocent.


“Erratic” It’s not erratic to slow down ready for the restart.


Every argument/opinion I’ve witnessed has presented nothing new or remotely plausible.  The FIA have access to the cars data something that is a must have.  Any alterations of that data or miss-leading (as we witnessed with the LieGate) – receives a harsh punishment.  In fact they’ve presented nothing new to the argument just “Lewis break tested.. okay he didn’t but he drove erratically”… he drove exactly how every safety car start has been.  Slowed down through normal means not breaking.  Something he has been slapped for before – which rightly so shouldn’t do.


 


 

Wednesday, 7 June 2017

Review: June Updated Mass Effect Andromeda


That Mass Effect Andromeda Update
Follow me on Twitter

 

You know every time I see an update coming I think – PLEASE FIX THIS GAME.


As I’ve previously posted about this game I think it’s fantastic and I’ve already finished this 3 times but now slowly working on a 4th (amongst other games).


Fundamental Issues with this Game

  • Animation problems still exist
  • Glitches on quests and again animations
  • Facial expressions still are poor


These are issues that start from the get go till the very end of the game.  This isn’t something you get to see once every now and then (like forming a relationship with characters) this is fundamental to the game.  It’s also caused it to sell poorly – this means we might be very lucky to get an Andromeda sequel but because of these core issues.

 

Then I saw #MakeJaalBi


I honestly don’t care if characters are bi/straight or even different genders.  I think it’s a great idea to allow people to explore whatever relationship with any character in this game.  BUT I’m sorry to say that these relationships are not fundamentals to the game.  It’s the first thing people fell in love with during the very original Mass Effect 1.  You don’t get to have any kind of relationship till mid stages of any of these games.  The first 30 minutes of Mass Effect was what made it popular.  The presentation, the graphics, the gameplay and the choices.  The latter being the icing on the cake.


Here we are, a company working on something that is the least of its problems.  I’m sorry if people take this personally (because that seems to be the world we live in now) but working on relationships or even sex scenes in Mass Effect Andromeda should not be a priority and really is poor prioritisation on behalf of Bioware.  I’m just waiting for the accusations of homophobia because again that’s the sad pathetic world we seem to live in.  Any negative comments about something that relates in any way to sexual orientation must be homophobia – even though this entire point is down to Bioware making an effort for relationships in a game over core problems that impact from the start to the end.  It’s like writing a book and ignoring poor spelling, grammar, punctuation and huge plot holes but changing a characters sexual orientation..  


The core issues with this game is preventing more sales, that’s more profits, that’s more attraction, players and fans to a popular series.  Instead let’s worry about a small group of people who seem to care about sexual orientations in this game above its core problems.


If Bioware had fixed all it’s more important and crucial problems I’d have absolutely no issue in them updating character options.  And let me also state that Bioware has added more character options….  Again what a waste of time.  People who have already played this would like me – almost be done with it while others are not even going to touch it because -----  CORE PROBLEMS ------.

As many who read/follow me I work in IT.  This means I have to prioritise.  It would be ridiculous for me to put resetting a student password first above our system failing.  It would be me worrying about an untidy cable instead of a server that’s died.  During the NHS Cyber Attack it would be them worrying about an untidy cable instead of entire systems being offline – POOR PRIORITISATION.  It doesn’t matter how you word it or how few would be angry over it.  There’s priorities and Bioware seems to have a major issue with this.  Perhaps the same people who defend this action ask yourself:  Would you prioritise buying a new BluRay Movie or perhaps bills/food?   One is a priority to live – the other is not.


Poor form Bioware poor form.  If this is how updates are going to be I expect this last run of Mass Effect Andromeda could be my last.  Perhaps in the DLC they can concentrate on giving us more relationship options instead of more story, improved animations and fixing glitches.  I mean who cares about all that right?  Just give us more relationships and more character customisation.  Now watch that DLC sell not so well….  People really have forgotten what games require – perhaps that’s why Bioware made a game with core issues they’ve forgotten about what’s important.

 

 

Tuesday, 16 May 2017

IT: That Cyber Attack at the NHS

That Cyber Attack
Follow me here on Twitter 

This may come across as a bit of a rant but this is a serious issue regarding IT in general not just the NHS but also Education and after talking to other IT professionals it’s a real problem.
 
As an IT worker in education we also get hit with these kind of issues, when it fails it’s end of the world when it’s working we often get asked “What do we do all day?”.  The later part is important because we are planning ahead, trying to upgrade equipment that you don’t see and generally working on development.  All under the radar.  No one sees it.
 
I remember moving onwards from Windows XP to Windows 7.  The first thing we did was create an imaging system which allowed us to mass upgrade a few hundred machines in a week.  Instead of manually building one at a time and installing every piece of software (average of 50) by hand taking 10 hours.  That system would take some months to develop, test and make sure it was perfect.  So once that was completed we would need to find the time to upgrade those hundreds of machines.  The good thing is doing student machines is easy during half terms.  It’s not often students are on site so we can easily run that system and walk away in each IT suite.
 
Staff PCs are a very different matter.. 
 
Remember those PCs are in use Monday to Friday 8-5 which is exactly our working hours (can’t be done remotely either because we didn’t have the capability).  We don’t work weekends and most public services will not pay IT over time (unless it was crucial like this Cyber Attack – if it was us in Education we would make up the hours – NOT paid overtime).  We also have to take in to consideration how many people do not follow standard procedures and save correctly.  I can’t tell you how many times I’ve argued with senior leaders in Schools over saving on their network area and NOT the local computer.  What would happen if their PC is infected, dies or a fire occurs – it’s gone.  So we have to manually take that data to avoid being shouted at – delaying the job.  The member of staff would have freed up a single lesson for us which would not be long enough.  We warn them, scream and beg for them not to save locally but they continue to do so.  When senior leaders are not telling them to do so – instead it’s our fault if it fails and they lose the data….
 
So again we tend to wait until half terms.. which the NHS does not have – how lucky are we?  There are times though that staff are on site during the holidays which means we have to work around them or we get another argument with that staff member.   What if they have staff laptops? Which again over complicates the issue because we need it with us when the staff member insists they can’t survive without it.
 
I’ve often argued with staff who have had their laptops stolen, dropped and severely smashed (they denied the later one too till we spot the damage).  It’s our fault that their data is not saved on the N Drive.  One particular member of staff had it happen 3 times!  Till the Head Teacher had to have words.  That’s what we’re dealing with every day.  I’ve often had arguments about staff not saving to the N Drive – any excuse they can use they will use it.
 
This sums up one of the many reasons why this Cyber Attack has occurred – no one listens.  Why listen to IT? We know nothing.  We don’t do our best to predict the worst outcomes for IT, we don’t worry about backups and servers that die.  The only time YOU worry is when something DOES happen.
 
No one Listens to us and everyone knows better
The sad thing is when it comes to simple tasks people want us holding their hands.  When it comes to the bigger projects, the bigger fish and generally the top end of tasks – everyone ignores the IT experts.  You only have to look at twitter regarding sales reps, training seminars and other professionals to see this.  I’ve often covered these in my blog posts.  They hate us because we do know better.  Who knows a car best? The mechanic and engineer not the racing driver.  Who knows a ship (boat) better? It’s not the captain, it’s not the sailor but it’s the chief engineer.   Update:  As I was typing this I already had an IT consultant try and tell me it’s easy to make everything up-to-date completely forgetting the points I’m making.  We don’t control what budgets we get, we don’t control the amount of staff we have and we don’t control the hours we are able to do any type of maintenance.  I even had someone compare painting walls and furniture – you mean when that entire room is closed and not even IT are allowed in? That if those contractors are given 5 days to complete their work they will have it done 1 day early so IT can perform their task?  Again it shows that severe lack of understanding.  We’re IT not site managers or responsible for buildings.  Whoever planned for those contractors will not even tell IT that it’s happening even after we constantly whine about not knowing….
 
This is quite standard in our profession.
 
We can be quite annoying but we are because:
  • We like to anticipate the worst outcomes, the what if scenarios and end of the world
  • We like backups, to cover the system and generally make sure it’s working 99.9999% of the time
  • We like official procedures and doing things properly
  • We try our best to predict your needs before you even know them
  • We are held back by time, money and staffing levels
 
The NHS Suffered heavy IT Cuts
Even if the Government gave the NHS more money I’d bet my body parts that we would still be in this situation.  Why spend money on IT when it’s currently working?
  • Employ more nurses
  • Employ more doctors
  • Build more rooms
  • Purchase more beds
  • Hire more cleaners and caretakers
  • Hire contractors to re-do rooms
 
There’s a million things the NHS would rather spend money on instead of worrying about an IT system which before the Cyber Attack was working fine.  Everyone does this.  In education IT is always one of the first areas to be hit with budget cuts and potential staff redundancies.  It’s also why Education goes through this nightmare of good periods to terrible periods – rarely in the middle.  You will have 3 years of good budgets, good staffing levels to revert back to poor budgets and too few staff.  It’s sad but it’s true.
 
Patches can be deployed by SCCM – something the IT Consultant mentioned to me.  Which costs money, which takes time to develop (anyone that knows SCCM will understand it’s fantastic but not a five minute installation).  Patching a PC also requires that machine to be on at a set time (we actually use WSUS here – something the consultant didn’t mention).  BUT – the machines must be on but when they automatically turn off late at night (we don’t use wakeup LAN – it’s in progress) it’s another milestone.  Systems like these take an age but what if you don’t have the staff? And systems like WSUS can’t be setup by a simple technician who knows how to trouble shoot.
 
We are told those PCs must not be impacted during working hours so we’ve got a period of 2 hours where those updates can deploy.  Updates are also not 100% reliable, we can at times encounter one update has killed a PC with the popular blue screen of death (although it’s no longer a BSD).  We also find that each month we don’t get 1 patch, it’s more like around 10 which must be deployed to almost 1000 PCs.  At the time when we was heavily removing XP from our site, it was a nightmare.  Fighting staff who don’t like change (we don’t make policy) fighting staff who don’t want you to interfere with their work hours (our working hours are the exact same during term time) and finally half terms are the only times we can do such large scale work.  Even those half terms get affected by students/staff on site – which we may not fully know of till last minute.  We also have the occasional building work meaning we can’t even access certain areas of the School or have power outages due to cabling works…  We currently have an entire building undergoing heavy amount of work.  Those contractors know they got till September to get their job done but what about the rest of us? Do we have to wait till staff return to actually get in to the rooms to setup IT? We’re talking dozens of PCs, boards and projectors in the space of a day.  It’s only through the sheer luck that we work well with the site staff who will demand those contractors are completed 1 week ahead of schedule so we can do our job.
 
This is what it’s like.  You are faced with the staff workers, the senior staff and contractors.  While also balancing your own holiday periods (my staff are only allowed time off during half terms).  With a team of 3 this entire thing becomes a balancing act.  We still get it done though.  IT consultants they don’t see that.  They see cooperative staff who listen to IT.  A bit like parents who see their little darling angels going to School to be nice to the teachers yet most teachers will say they are not angels and the parents don’t believe it because they don’t see it.
 
A few years ago this wouldn’t be the case and I can’t stress enough about the potential risk this School would be at if we didn’t have several changes occur.  Now this is a perfect example of what stops IT:
Lack of Time – Through endless amount of fire fighting (please see other posts about BYOD).  If there’s no time for anything to be developed what can we do?
Lack of Budget No server expenditure, no networking improvements and general IT aged to 10+ years old – To develop things like SCCM you need a  £ S E R V E R £ – usually Virtualised
Lack of Staff (2 and a bit man power employed for a very large system with heavy IT reliance)
Doing other tasks – Something especially outside of education no one understands. 
 
We’ve been expected to be:
Administration workers (printing, creating documents, dealing with letters)
Teaching assistants (supporting classrooms with general student support – not IT faults)
Media and film technician (supporting media, sound, creativity and film)
Second main reception (we’ve had a lot of parents calling us up directly)
And being teachers by showing students how to do tasks. 
 
All the above is why at times IT have issues.  It’s like saying it’s easy for a mechanic to maintain 100  cars a week while he deals with being a receptionist, finance officer and dealing with everyone’s complaints and phone conversations.  It all adds up.  Anyone that says otherwise has led a very much easy job with very little pressure  - I’ve often fallen out with IT people because they don’t realise how it is at other places.  I count myself very lucky to be where we are now at my work place.
 
Interesting thing is one of the very people responsible for my team doing the above is one of those who would complain if IT failed in any single way.  At the time we was not spending any time (not even 1 hour a week) developing.
 
Now where are we?
My team perform IT work around 95% of the year – it’s still not perfect but better.
Our servers are reliable to the point they work 98% of the year – still not perfect but we’re getting there.
Our network is 96% 1GB capacity but again still not perfect.
Our average age of equipment is now 6 years old with future ideas to help cut down costs – cost cutting still exists!
 
That’s on top of having a budget cut and staff cut.  What do we do though?  The HT has to make cost savings site wide.  Sooner or later I can see us losing another team member due to the Government costs.
 
We’ve got too many Enemies
Again it’s sad but true.  The SLT will often look at us with £££ on our heads, a resource that they can survive without.  You also have the Heads of Music and ICT who will hate us because we hold them back in their eyes.  We stop them from having what they want over what’s best for the School.  We stop them from having fancy gizmos and gadgets because we would rather spend money upgrading Windows XP to Windows 7.  We would rather spend the money replacing 10 year old equipment instead of that fancy pretty toy.  The Governors will often never see us, the kids only look at us like a stranger to reset a password and the staff… they see us as an annoyance.
 
How many will be expected to turn up Monday morning and want everything to be fixed?  You know by those staff working 9-5 mon- fri? The ones who shouldn’t be working weekends or are being paid peanuts to do extremely high pressured work?
 
You’ve also got to consider massive amount of changes that take endless amount of hours to resolve.  How many Schools go down the route of outsourcing IT, redundancies and replacement staff?  All of that takes time to resolve.  It’s like you’re trying to do your job while on a train – you’ve got no choice but to ride it out.
 
We’ve actually gone through BYOD schemes that take a lot of work out of our week and every year it’s changed in some way – taking more time.  There’s no consistency in IT especially in education.  What do people need the most? Consistency.  When you consider how much IT itself changes when other things change you’ve turned a small task to a bigger one.  The BYOD scheme occurred completely outside of the advice from us in IT.  The mess it caused was unbelievable but who cleans up that mess? We do.
 
We are NOT perfect
I once worked at a School that got heavily infected over a decade ago.  I warned those above that it could happen because we didn’t update and generally had the arrogance that it “won’t hit us”….
 
It did..  luckily enough our servers were protected because I took it out of my own hours to update them.  Our best IT suites were left untouched.  The current person in charge of IT got slaughtered by SLT (rightly so) because he only cared about his own wage package and ambition.  The sad part is.. they actually listened to him quite a lot before that day.  He knew best because he was the socialite.  He always fixed those who had the biggest voices in the School while neglecting everyone else.  Under the radar I was.
 
Then you have to think about who Schools employ – usually fresh ex-students.  They can’t manage servers, they can’t manage systems, they can’t manage budgets and they certainly can’t plan ahead.  What they can do is the simple tasks that anyone can do – reset passwords.  Not nice but it’s true.  Why do they employ ex-students? Money saving and an arrogance in to thinking IT is easy when you know the basics.  Just because someone can change a car tyre it doesn’t mean they can MOT, Service and perform maintenance on a car.  Let’s face it to fully hire a decent IT staff level you’re talking at least £80,000 when you include pensions – that’s 2-3 teachers.
 
Centralised IT
This is the biggest downside about centralising IT, resorting to agency workers and outsourced IT support.  You place all your eggs in one basket and when that has problems – you lose everything.  Centralised IT means you have more servers, less technicians and less expenditure on every day equipment.  All about one thing – cost cutting – certainly nothing more and nothing less.
 
Schools are heading down this route with MATs (Multi Academy Trusts) all for one thing – cost cutting.  They will want to link up their IT systems across the Schools, remove the need to replace equipment and cut down the staff; all for one thing – cost cutting.  They will spend money on Virtualised Servers which are fantastic but it puts them all under a single roof.
 
We will be back here again one day like everyone.  Every few years people dump a lot of money on IT, cut it all back and then revert back to day one.  The vicious IT circle I call it.  The weird thing is the very people complaining about this could be the very people who treat IT people poorly.  Whom often ask – what do they do all day.  IT is like a child where you constantly need to be vigilant.
 
I’m not surprised at all at what’s happened in the NHS and globally.  Schools often go down BYOD/Mobile technology routes because it’s pretty instead of spending money upgrading IT.  They often purchase Macs because they look pretty and you have to remember if the world was Mac – they’d be hit.  I’ve seen an infected Mac but why create virus’s and malware for systems that are rare.  Even Smartphones are being targeted far more than Macs because everyone has a Smartphone.
 
Why is IT expensive? It doesn’t have to be but you get too many fish ponds involved.  You will have the main boss, who asks a senior manager and that person talks to the consultant who then reverts to the actual IT Manager.  It takes far too many steps to get to the truth.  To the person who really is clued up.
 
While typing this blog I’ve already argued with a few who are completely ignoring these points about budget cuts.  It impacts an incredible amount.  Everyone is more bothered about throwing complaints at Hunt who let’s face it won’t understand anything or even care.  No managers at the top really deal with IT unless it’s their own iPad.  They will pass it on to someone else and down the chain.  This will all boil down to the fact that NHS leaders decided to cut back IT like most public services do.
 
Schools are not lucky – Thank the IT Staff who tend to ignore those above
Not many Schools have been hit by this mess.  It’s not thanks to good budgets or good leadership of the Schools – in fact it’s down to IT.  Those who work extra hours for no pay, those who perform remote work from home all because they care.  Many of us see the IT system as our family member.  We want the best of that IT system, we want everything to work regardless.  I can’t stress the amount of unpaid hours I’ve worked in the last 12 months let alone 4 years or almost two decades of working.  All because I care.  We’ve often seen malware infections but only on a per PC basis caused by a single staff member (had three PCs in 4 years).  Staff training really means nothing, you’re fighting staff who really don’t think about what they click on.  They save work from 10 years ago and copy to keep it.  Another 10 years they’ve built up work they didn’t know they have.
 
The thing is none of these ‘attacks’ are new.  Malware has been around for many years I think my first case of malware was around 10 years ago.  These attacks can impact education and who will be the ones blamed – IT.  While those at the top who have made the cutbacks and held back IT will be blameless.  Not many Schools can afford qualified and experienced staff – most leave education to go to business.  Many of us can earn £10K more outside of education but we enjoy the challenge it brings (plus the not so stressful half terms with not many on site).
 
So before you moan about people at the top think about those IT who actually have made big differences for peanuts (also earning less than those working in the NHS IT departments).
 
How many of us have developed systems outside of normal hours because we’re firefighting all day.  Spending our days resetting passwords, in classrooms fixing PCs and projectors while attempting to keep old outdated servers running.
 
At the time I returned to work on Monday I had already gotten over a dozen emails of staff who attempted to advise or ask are we okay.  My response to everyone was we’re safe (touch wood).  We removed XP, we keep our system updated and I made it very clear that this was the result of all the hard work we had done.

Remember us.
 
The rant
Do apologise for this seeming like a huge rant but I’ve personally been on the end of something very similar.  You are being held back by budget, time and staffing yet it’s still your fault.  You have everyone phoning you up while your still trying to fix the problem – each interruption delays you fixing it.  You have everyone telling you how to do it better; when?  Yes set it to go automatic even though you’ve not got the time or money to get that system setup in the first place.  A good little example – while I type this I’m remotely installing a piece of software.  In two whole days this is the only 20 minute window I have.  The member of staff does the same hours as me and this can’t be done remotely because of the type of software it is.  Any issues with this – it’s scrapped and I have to wait another three whole days for a chance to do it again.
 
I even remember having to stay back several evenings with a severe server failure.  One night I left on time to remotely carry on to have one member staff question to someone else why am I not staying till late to get it working.  This is the state of people that don’t fully understand IT and working with day to day people (especially large amounts with SLT who don’t want downtime).  If you tell me Downtime must happen regardless – you’ve not working in Education.
 
We’re going to be installing SSDs to every PC next year – can this be done automatically? No.  Each one has to be done by hand.  We also don’t have the means to build up those SSDs beforehand (we don’t even have them yet till budget renewal in September – meaning can’t do it during the Summer break).  This will not only cause downtime of the staff PCs but require manual installation of SIMs (won’t image) and the staff member to save all data to their network drive (not going to happen no matter how much I beg/scream).
 
People have little to no idea what it’s really like to work in an environment held back by so much, while everyone expects the world.  No one cares till it breaks, when it’s working people think we’re playing games.
 
You look at this cyber-attack, it was really caused by some one click a link on an email after already being warned not to.  That person will not be in trouble, will not get a talking to or anything.  Yet no one cares about this no one cares that this was truly caused by the everyday user.